Below are some recent publications of THE INSTITUTE FOR TRADE, STANDARDS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
| Issue date | Publication | Article Title | Reference |
| August 2009 | Santa Clara Journal of International Law |
Summary: The congressional hearings on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) thus far convened by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations/SFRC make a mockery of the US Senate’s constitutional ‘advise and consent’ responsibility and offend Americans’ constitutional ‘right-to-know’ about matters that are likely to adversely affect their constitutional rights and economic lives and to impair US national sovereignty. The purpose of this article is to prompt the United States Congress to hold open, transparent and substantive public hearings to discuss, evaluate and explain to the American people the significant environmental regulatory and judicial enforcement aspects of the UNCLOS before that treaty is submitted to the full Senate for a vote of accession.
|
pp. 21-166 |
| July 10, 2009 | Washington Legal Foundation Legal Backgrounder Vol. 24 No. 23 |
Summary: As debate continues over whether the US will accede to the UNCLOS, Congress and the Executive Branch are quietly working to inject UNCLOS environmental principles into U.S. law. Arguably, U.S. UNCLOS accession would explicitly embed Europe’s Precautionary Principle into the U.S. legal system at severe cost to the U.S. economy and national security.
|
pp. 1-4 |
| April 10, 2009 | Washington Legal Foundation Critical Legal Issues Working Paper Series Number 163 |
Summary: This article explains how green groups endeavored to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to reform U.S. federal environmental regulatory law ‘from the bench’ by incorporating at least one of three different applications of Europe’s Precautionary Principle within its recent 2008 decision in NRDC v. Winter.
|
pp. 1-39 |
| Feb. 13, 2009 |
Washington Legal Foundation Legal
Backgrounder
Vol. 24 No. 6 |
Summary: This article identifies how France is working to export the main tenets of its civil law system of preventive justice throughout global commerce to ‘change’ international law and the Anglo-American free enterprise system.
|
pp.1-4 |
| September 2008 |
Ideas, Innovation and Patents
ICFAI Law Books Division, ICFAI University Press, Andhra
Pradesh, India Edited by C. Sri Krishna |
Summary: This article explains the important governmental role in framing and implementing a well-balanced intellectual property rights regime that can facilitate indigenous technology development, attract foreign direct investment and encourage technology transfer of Government-funded laboratory research to those private hands most capable of commercializing those inventions into market-relevant innovations. |
Chapter 5, pp. 103-133. |
| September 2008 | Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review Vol. 17, No. 2 |
Summary: Certain American politicians have quietly worked with European governments to 'change' America ’s Regulatory Landscape at the state and local levels. This places America's individual rights-based federal system and Americans' constitutionally guaranteed exclusive private property rights at risk.
|
pp. 491-607 |
| August 2008 |
CQ Global Researcher Vol. 2, No. 8 |
Summary: ITSSD CEO Participates in point/counterpoint face-off with US Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski over whether the US should ratify the UNCLOS at the present time without holding any open and transparent substantive public hearings to investigate the UNCLOS' extensive environmental regulatory framework.
|
pp. 214-232, at p.235 |
| Spring 2008 |
Washington
Undergraduate Law Review (U. of Washington) Vol. II, Issue 3 |
By Francis Tanczos Summary: Since China's accession to the WTO, trade relations between the US and China have become visibly more tense. While the US insists on treating China as a non-market economy, China continues to engage in unfair dumping of low-cost goods, which has a negative effect on US producers. The US has responded by imposing some disguised trade barriers. However, how the issue of dumping is handled has serious implications for the future of US-Chinese trade relations. |
pp. 77-93. |
| March 21, 2008 |
WLF Legal
Backgrounder
|
Summary: Common bases in Russian and US history have triggered new thinking in Russia about how to use privately owned patent rights and cooperative government-university-industry technology transfer arrangements to secure successful market commercialization and peaceful adaptation of publicly-owned bio-warfare technologies. The American experience in innovation and intellectual property (patents and trade secrets) may thus be advantageous to use in Russia. |
|
| Dec. 2, 2007 |
Cape Cod
Times Weekend Forum
|
Summary: US LOST ratification would signal our acceptance of long-established customary international freedom of navigation principles, as the US Navy and Coast Guard have asserted. However, the general rule of “freedom of navigation/innocent passage” which the administration relies upon as the chief justification for binding America to this treaty has, over time, been eroded and diminished in scope by the LOST’s more numerous environmental regulatory exceptions.
|
(pp. G-1 and G-5) |
| Oct. 9, 2007 |
Global
Trade and Customs Journal (Kluwer Law Int’l)
|
Summary: This article details how the EU and its member states previously enlisted private regional environmental standards bodies to promote official government sustainable forest management policies that likely violated the WTO rights of developing countries and their industries. It also describes how these same EU governments are behind the ongoing efforts of other regional pressure groups to promote, thru UN agencies and international standardization organizations, the adoption of overly strict & expensive corporate social responsibility standards by global industry supply chains.
|
(pp. 319-337) |
| August 8, 2007 | Washington Times | LOST and Found | Rebuttals |
|
Summary: Congress must hold open
hearings on ratification of the UN Law of the Sea Treaty before the
Senate gives its advice and consent. It must educate Americans about
how the expansive LOST regime, as it will likely be implemented by
the United States, the United Nations and foreign governments,
especially those in Europe, would directly and indirectly affect
their pocketbooks, their rights and their daily lives.
|
|||
| June 22, 2007 | WLF Legal Backgrounder |
Forced Licensing of Drug Patents Reflects ‘IP Counterfeiting’
Efforts on World Stage
|
|
| June 22, 2007 | Revista Leader Magazine, (Published by the Instituto De Estudos Empresariais, Porto Alegre, Brasil) | Lula Desrespeita A Propriedade Privada ‘Tomando’ OS DPP De Investidores Estrangeiros | (p.47 at 8) |
|
(Lula Disrespects Private
Property, ‘Taking’ Foreign Investors’ DPP) Summary: Two related articles appearing in Washington, DC and Porto Alegre, Brazil review the multiple bases offered by the Brazilian government for its illegal ‘taking’ of the American HIV/AIDS drug Efavirenz at less than ‘fair’ compensation. |
|||
| March 27, 2007 | Speciality Chemicals Magazine – Viewpoint Column |
|
p. 4 (hardcopy) |
|
Summary: The EU REACH regulatory regime is blatantly extra-territorial, violates national sovereignty and will soon be Imposed on industry up and down global product/process supply chains. Thus it is in the economic, legal and political interests of non-European companies, especially those based in developing countries and within the US, to challenge it at the World Trade Organisation (WTO). |
|||
| March 21, 2007 | Global Trade and Customs Journal (Kluwer Law Int’l) |
|
pp. 149-155 |
|
Summary: The WTO Panel decision, in the EC Biotech Products case, reaffirmed that scientific risk assessment rather than political hazard profiling is the definitive WTO benchmark for health and environmental regulation purposes. It also validated the prudent long-term U.S. strategy of remaining outside UN environmental treaties favored by Europe. |
|||
| Mar 19, 2007 | University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 1 |
|
pp. 1-139 |
| Summary: During the past decade, Brazil has embarked on a global campaign, quietly assisted by certain socialist governments and extremists, to establish a new international economic order that threatens the constitutionally protected exclusive private intellectual property rights of U.S. citizens. | |||
| January 29, 2007 | Financial Times |
Ownership and Self-help Will Best
Protect French Employee Interests Summary: The total cost of employing a worker in France is so high that it constrains business and job growth, badly needed company investments and entrepreneurial risk-taking. Unless some level of free market reform is permitted to take place, France is unlikely "to revive its flagging growth and competitiveness". Private property ownership and self-help, rather than dialogue and government-imposed regulation, is what will best protect Frenchemployee interests.
|
Leaders & Letters |
| Dec 15, 2006 |
ITSSD Website |
|
|
|
Summary:
The WTO recently disregarded the
Precautionary Principle in the EU Biotech Products dispute, and the
EC even agreed to ‘accept’ the ruling as final. Yet, despite this
world body’s considered opinion, or perhaps, in spite of it, the EC
decided to adopt the Precautionary Principle-based REACH. |
|||
| Dec 14, 2006 |
ITSSD Website |
|
|
| Dec 8 , 2006 |
WLF Legal Backgrounder |
Principle” |
|
|
Summary:
A recent World Trade Organization
(WTO) ruling represents a blow to the proponents of the
“Precautionary Principle” in Europe and a victory for ‘best
available science’ in the regulatory process. |
|||
| Oct 31 , 2006 |
ITSSD Web Site |
|
|
|
Summary:
New ITSSD Article Outlines How
U.S. Politicians Abducted By 'Aliens' Are Silently Replacing Your
Private Property With Public Goods As You Sleep. |
|||
| Sept. 29, 2006 |
Financial Times |
|
Leaders & Letters |
|
Summary:
Private intellectual property (eg
a patent) is important precisely because knowledge is an intangible
good that is not readily susceptible to valuation. |
|||
| Sept. 21, 2006 |
International Journal of Economic
Development (IJED) Vol. 8, Nos. 1-2 (2006) |
|
IJED Website |
|
Executive Summary: This article documents how the Brazilian government, assisted by ideological activists, academics and politicians, has brazenly led a bloc of emerging and less developed economies to craft a highly controversial anti-intellectual property right (IPR) legal framework that will undermine exclusive private property rights and free enterprise globally. The article provides evidence showing why Brazil should pursue 'bottom-up' IP-based innovation rather than 'top-down' IP opportunism to stimulate domestic innovation and generate economic growth. |
|||
|
August 11, 2006 |
ITSSD Web Site |
|
|
|
Summary:
As a rule of thumb,
leisure-minded travel magazines do not embed subtle political messages or admonitions, disguised as promotional fluff, intended to antagonize foreign government and industry officials. That is typically reserved for more serious political, economic or legal journals or newspaper editorials. Why then, has the Conde Nast Traveler done just that, in a recent article about Brussels, Belgium? |
|||
|
July 6, 2006 |
ITSSD Web Site |
|
|
|
Summary:
Mr. Lamy should be applauded for
his speech on WTO treaties. However, would Mr. Lamy be equally as
forthcoming in providing answers to the following questions? |
|||
|
July 6, 2006 |
ITSSD Web Site |
|
|
|
Summary:
During the past decade, a new
genre of disguised protectionist trade barriers (non-science and
non-economics-based technical regulations and standards) premised on
illusory environment (pollution) and health (SD) concerns has
evolved. |
|||
|
June 30, 2006 |
ITSSD Web Site |
|
|
|
Summary:
In this article, the ITSSD
examines whether the Western Governors' Clean Energy Plan, which is
intended to terminate the phantom menace known as global warming, is
actually another back-door’ environmental regulatory ‘takings’
regime that will benefit some at the expense of others. |
|||
|
April 6, 2006 |
TCS Daily |
|
|
|
Summary:
This article discusses how the EU
Commission is trying to reclaim the hijacked concept of corporate
social responsibility as a voluntary industry initiative, given the
recent efforts of European nonprofit pressure groups to impose legal
CSR restrictions on European and American businesses. |
|||
|
Mar. 13, 2006 |
ITSSD Web Site |
|
|
|
Summary:
This article finds that the
politically motivated and hyperbolic U.S. Congress and media,
supported by some in industry, have once again seized the
opportunity to scuttle an international business transaction under
false pretenses.
|
|||
|
Nov. 28, 2005 |
PR Newswire |
|
|
|
Summary:
This article finds that the tough
questions are not being answered - calls on nine northeastern
governors to open up the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)
to public debate.
|
|||
| August 30, 2005 | Tech Central Station |
|
|
|
Summary: This article
briefly discusses how the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)
being developed by the governors and regulators of nine northeastern
states to cap power plan carbon dioxide emissions will significantly
raise energy, goods and services prices for regional businesses and
consumers without providing measurable environmental benefits. A
more in-depth analysis of RGGI is set forth within the ITSSD's
recent July 2005 white paper. |
|||
| June
28, 2005 |
Rural News NZ |
|
|
|
Summary: This article
discusses how Greenpeace's ability to harass companies and
scientists in the UK about their GMO activities has unfortunately
encouraged other groups, namely, animal rights activists, to do the
same there. This prompted Prime Minister Tony Blair's previous
government to recommend the enactment of a new criminal offense
called 'economic sabotage'. It is doubtful, however, whether such a
law was ever enacted. |
|||
| Nov. 2004 | IHT Editorial |
|
|
|
Summary: This recent World
Bank report reveals that the true motivation underlying Europe’s
enactment of strict precautionary principle-based biotechnology
regulations is economic rather than health and environment-related.
It debunks the popular myth that Europeans are more concerned with
protecting the natural environment and are less trusting of their
food regulators than Americans are.
|
|||
| Oct. 2004 | EU Reporter |
|
Page 6 |
|
Summary: A recent World
Bank report finds that stringent precautionary principle-based
biotechnology regulations recently enacted by the EU Commission are
actually disguised trade barriers. As noted by the World Bank, these
regulations were designed chiefly to protect Europe’s ailing
agricultural sector and its underdeveloped biotechnology sector.
|
|||
| Sept. 2004 | National Interest Journal |
|
Pages 91-99 |
|
Summary: This article
discusses how the EU, with assistance from global civil society, has
defined a new global paradigm that it believes all nations must
follow. This paradigm stresses the political role of the UN and the
need to achieve sustainable development over facilitating free
markets and technological innovation, pursuing free trade and
securing global economic stability.
|
|||
| Aug. 2004 | Seton Hall Journal |
|
Pages 77-122 |
|
Summary: This article
discusses how differently America and the European Union view the
role of science in evaluating public risks/hazards. It also explains
how the EU seeks to establish the precautionary principle as an
absolute international standard that would govern the use of science
and technology by all WTO member nations.
|
|||
| May 2004 | EU Reporter |
|
Page 18 |
|
Summary: This article
explains why efforts made by the U.S. government and the U.S.
chemicals industry to shape the EU’s REACH regulation were both
proper and fully consistent with international trade law. It also
reveals why the Waxman Report and activist claims of ‘improper
influence’ were politically rather than environmentally motivated.
|
|||
| Vol. III, No.2 Summer/Fall 2002 | Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy |
|
Pages 52-92 |
|
Summary: This article discusses
how the Bush Administration’s 2002 Climate Change Plan and the
Energy and Climate Change bills proposed during 2002 by the 107th
Congress collectively present a viable and realistic alternative to
the Kyoto Protocol. It concludes that the U.S. need not adhere to
the Kyoto Protocol in order to achieve sustainable development.
|
|||